Which of the following is a valid ground for license revocation related to moral character?

The conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude is a valid ground for license revocation related to moral character because moral turpitude typically refers to conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty, or good morals. In the context of funeral service, which places a high premium on ethical behavior and trust, a conviction for a crime deemed to reflect on one’s moral character can be detrimental to the integrity of the profession. Such a conviction suggests a lack of fitness to uphold the ethical responsibilities required in the field, thereby justifying revocation of licensure.

The other options do not represent grounds for license revocation based on moral character. Past job experience, while potentially relevant to qualifications, does not inherently reflect on one’s moral character. Being late for appointments, while unprofessional, does not constitute a moral failing. Likewise, failing to renew competency credits, though it may raise questions about diligence or professionalism, does not generally reflect on an individual's moral character directly.